brand logo

Am Fam Physician. 2024;110(4):423

Author disclosure: No relevant financial relationships.

CLINICAL QUESTION

Does pet therapy improve anxiety?

EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

Pet therapy is used to treat anxiety because it notably reduces self-reported anxiety across multiple age groups. (Strength of Recommendation [SOR]: A, meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [RCTs], controlled trials, and observational studies.) Most pet therapy studies involve dogs, but cats and horses also have been studied. In patients with dementia, animal-assisted therapy reduces behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia and depression. (SOR: A, meta-analysis of RCTs.)

EVIDENCE SUMMARY

A 2018 meta-analysis of 10 RCTs, 10 non-RCTs, and eight observational studies (N = 1,310) examined the effect of exposure to pet therapy on self-reported stress and anxiety scores across all ages and health statuses.1 Twenty-three studies included adults (n = 1,225) and five studies included children (n = 85). Patients with anxiety or anxiety-associated diagnoses were seen in various settings, including outpatient, inpatient, and residential. Measurements were obtained immediately before and after pet therapy and included observed physiologic metrics and self-scoring indicators of stress and/or anxiety. Dogs were used in most studies, but two included cats.

In data pooled from the 28 studies, pet therapy produced a moderate decrease in self-reported anxiety (effect size = −0.50; 95% CI, −0.63 to −0.37). Key limitations were that most of the data were from observational or exploratory studies and anxiety measurement methods were highly variable.

A 2022 meta-analysis of 11 RCTs (N = 825) examined the effects of animal-assisted therapy using behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia for assessment.2 Patients diagnosed with dementia were exposed to animals ranging from 10-minute visits twice weekly for 2 weeks to 1-hour sessions twice weekly for 8 months. In most trials, participants in the intervention groups interacted with dogs and in one trial the participants interacted with horses. Participants in the control groups did not receive animal-assisted therapy.

Using various validated tools to measure outcomes, results were pooled and converted to a standardized mean difference (SMD). In three trials, the animal-assisted therapy groups had significantly improved scores on problem behavior and neuropsychiatric inventory scales vs. the control groups (three trials; n = 418; SMD = −0.43; 95% CI, −0.62 to −0.23). In five trials, depression scores also vastly improved in the animal-assisted therapy groups vs. control groups (five trials; n = 497; SMD = −0.50; 95% CI, −0.68 to −0.32). A 2021 RCT (N = 47) studied the effectiveness of a single animal-assisted therapy session for patients in Poland who were being treated for anxiety disorder or mixed depressive-anxiety disorder.3 Patients (mean age = 34 years) were recruited from small group therapy sessions. Exclusion criteria included a fear of dogs, dog-related allergies, or a severe somatic condition, but no patients were excluded.

Twenty-one patients interacted with a dog during a short 15- to 20-minute walk with a dog and its handler, whereas a control group of 26 patients walked with a medical student or physician. Subjective anxiety was assessed using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, consisting of 20 state questions (“I am tense; I am worried” or “I feel calm; I feel secure”), rating each answer from “1 = not at all” to “4 = totally agree,” and 20 trait questions (“I worry too much over something that really doesn't matter” or “I am content; I am a steady person”), rating each comment from “1 = almost never” to “4 = almost always.” Questionnaires were given before the dog interaction and repeated immediately after. For the treatment group, postintervention scores for anxiety state were significantly lower than those for the control group (mean = 34 vs. 41; P < .001).

Help Desk Answers provides answers to questions submitted by practicing family physicians to the Family Physicians Inquiries Network (FPIN). Members of the network select questions based on their relevance to family medicine. Answers are drawn from an approved set of evidence-based resources and undergo peer review. The strength of recommendations and the level of evidence for individual studies are rated using criteria developed by the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (https://www.cebm.net).

The complete database of evidence-based questions and answers is copyrighted by FPIN. If interested in submitting questions or writing answers for this series, go to https://www.fpin.org or email: questions@fpin.org.

This series is coordinated by John E. Delzell Jr., MD, MSPH, associate medical editor.

A collection of FPIN’s Help Desk Answers published in AFP is available at https://www-aafp-org.lib3.cgmh.org.tw:30443/afp/hda.

Continue Reading

More in AFP

More in PubMed

Copyright © 2024 by the American Academy of Family Physicians.

This content is owned by the AAFP. A person viewing it online may make one printout of the material and may use that printout only for his or her personal, non-commercial reference. This material may not otherwise be downloaded, copied, printed, stored, transmitted or reproduced in any medium, whether now known or later invented, except as authorized in writing by the AAFP.  See permissions for copyright questions and/or permission requests.